[vc_row css_animation=”” row_type=”row” use_row_as_full_screen_section=”no” type=”full_width” angled_section=”no” text_align=”left” background_image_as_pattern=”without_pattern”][vc_column][vc_column_text]<– Return[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css_animation=”” row_type=”row” use_row_as_full_screen_section=”no” type=”full_width” angled_section=”no” text_align=”left” background_image_as_pattern=”without_pattern”][vc_column width=”2/3″]
Personally, I feel deeply that we are each a kind of wave in the ocean of the universe, everything living through us as us. So it’s OK eventually to open out into everything, which is what we were all along. And which in my experience rests mysteriously in timelessness, and profound peacefulness, and a kind of love.[/vc_column_text]
With respect, I’d offer that multiple things can be true side by side: mental activity changes the brain, mindfulness practice has many benefits including altering brain structure and function, and sometimes illness or dysfunction still comes our way. For me, acquiring an illness is nothing to be guilty about! Instead of the self-criticism implicit in guilt, self-compassion is called for, and gladness and self-respect for all the good practices you have been doing over the years.
Last, I am not aware of any research on this (though there might be some I don’t know about), but to me it is plausible that repeated mental training focused on what might be deteriorating (such as memory or motor control) could have benefits, at least in slowing the progression of illness or in strengthening compensatory factors or processes.[/vc_column_text]
[/vc_column_text]
Second, I try to see the whole mosaic of reality, which includes both beings that will be harmed and beings that will be loved. Recognizing the good (using that word loosely) does not mean not recognizing and feeling moved by the bad; and seeing the good can help us bear and sometimes improve the bad.[/vc_column_text]
Speaking personally, I try to approach my own health issues on both levels, mental and physical, based on sensible and individualized methods that have reasonable evidence, including the evidence of whether they are actually producing results for me.
Additionally, as an individual choice, I also include what could be called the spiritual level, distinct from the natural processes within our big bang universe, which include our thoughts and feelings, hopes and dreams . . . as well as our organs and DNA. Others may not want to do this, and I respect that choice.
I have no problem with people who include the possibility of spiritual factors in their healing of a medical condition. I do think it is foolish to do this in a way that excludes or minimizes the role of the physical level in our healing. We have real bodies, they are full of real cells and molecules and microbes, and this physical stuff really matters, and modern medicine has many effective ways to deal with it. Sure, doctors can make mistakes, and we need to be aware of the financial incentives such as from pharmaceutical companies that tilt medical treatments toward certain approaches and away from others. I turn to doctors who listen carefully, don’t patronize, individualize their approach to me rather than “one size fits all,” and recognize the potential usefulness of complementary and holistic methods. But I would not want to use the spiritual level to crowd out sensible, standard medical interventions.[/vc_column_text]
For example, there is a joke in medicine about how progress occurs:
Stage 1: That’s crazy, it should be outlawed, anyone who does that should lose their license.
Stage 2: It shows promise but needs more studies.
Stage 3: We knew it all along.
In my view it is important to find a middle way between dogmatic resistance to innovation on the one hand and wild-eyed adoption of dangerous unproven methods on the other. For me, there are three markers of this middle path:
Regarding #3, if the risks of a medical intervention are high, then the evidence for it should be equally high. On the other hand, if the risks are low, then the threshold of evidence for trying something can be low as well. This is a key point.
For example, the third leading cause of death in America is medical error, causing about 200,000 deaths per year, mainly involving medications. (Which is a more serious problem, the Goop Lab or deaths due to medical error?) The tools used by physicians are powerful, so they need to be very very well justified. Interestingly, in the Lancet a few years ago, it was acknowledged that about half of the methods that medical professionals use every day, in hospitals and outside them, do not have a single study that supports them. This does not mean they are malpractice. But I think it suggests that there should not be a double standard in which high risk medical interventions – often backed by the potent lobbying efforts of pharmaceutical companies – are used routinely with minimal research evidence while low risk health recommendations such as “reduce carbohydrates and eat more whole foods” are challenged for not having enough studies behind them.
As to what is “unscientific,” if this term means that something requires multiple excellent studies to be credible…then that view is itself truly unscientific. First, many things are true that no scientific study can prove.
For example, if you love someone, no study in the world can prove it. Second, just because there wasn’t yet a study that vitamin D may reduce the consequences of Covid-19 did not mean that this was not true all along. As the genuinely scientific saying puts it: “The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” For me, “unscientific” means something contrary to what science has clearly shown to be true, such as biological evolution.[/vc_column_text]
[/vc_column_text]

Being Resilient During Coronavirus
[/vc_column_text][vc_separator type=”normal”][vc_column_text]COVID19 Vaccination – Q&A[/vc_column_text][vc_separator type=”normal”][vc_column_text]
Being Well Podcast: Managing Bipolar Disorder
[/vc_column_text][vc_separator type=”normal”][vc_column_text]
Being Well Podcast: Dealing with Life’s Disruptions
[/vc_column_text][vc_separator type=”normal”][vc_column_text]
Being Well Podcast: Becoming Bulletproof with Dave Asprey
[/vc_column_text][vc_separator type=”normal”][vc_column_text]
[/vc_column_text][vc_separator type=”normal”][vc_column_text]
Train Your Brain: Filling Your Body’s Cupboard
[/vc_column_text][vc_separator type=”normal”][vc_column_text]
Mind Changing Brain Changing Mind
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]